What is required for the corroboration of informant's information to be considered meaningful?

• A. Information must be verified by a witness
• B. Details must relate to easily obtainable facts
• C. Details must relate to less accessible actions of third parties
• D. All obtained information must be public knowledge

Answer: (C)

For corroboration of an informant's information to be deemed meaningful, it is crucial that the details relate to less accessible actions of third parties. This requirement stems from the need to establish reliability and credibility in the informant's information. When the affiant can corroborate that the informant possesses knowledge about actions that are not readily observable or accessible to the ordinary person, it strengthens the case for trusting the informant's tip.

In essence, when the information given by an informant pertains to activities or facts that would likely remain unknown without the insider's knowledge—such as ongoing criminal activities or specific illegal transactions—it lends substantial support to the informant's credibility. This sort of corroboration is necessary for law enforcement to ensure that they are not acting solely on unverified tips but rather on substantiated claims that can lead to further investigation or action.

In contrast, verifying information through a witness or relying on details pertaining to easily obtainable facts does not provide the same level of assurance regarding the informant's reliability and may not substantiate the claim effectively. Similarly, the requirement that all obtained information must be public knowledge would not fulfill the need for meaningful corroboration, as it does not lend any unique insight or verification relevant to the informant's knowledge.